This Friday an important surveillance bill expires. From the State of the Union address:
“To protect America, we need to know who the terrorists are talking to, what they are saying, and what they are planning. Last year, the Congress passed legislation to help us do that. Unfortunately, the Congress set the legislation to expire on February 1. This means that if you do not act by Friday, our ability to track terrorist threats would be weakened and our citizens will be in greater danger. The Congress must ensure the flow of vital intelligence is not disrupted. The Congress must pass liability protection for companies believed to have assisted in the efforts to defend America. We have had ample time for debate. The time to act is now.”
Well, I don’t know about you, but I feel safer. We don’t live in a police state, we live in a state of paranoia. And those companies that “assisted” to “defend America” sold us out. What those companies did was illegal! They should be punished not protected. I like this article from Wired by Bruce Schneier,
“We’ve been told we have to trade off security and privacy so often — in debates on security versus privacy, writing contests, polls, reasoned essays and political rhetoric — that most of us don’t even question the fundamental dichotomy.
But it’s a false one.”
” The debate isn’t security versus privacy. It’s liberty versus control. “
Of course we all know that people with liberty are out of control.